Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01643
Original file (BC 2013 01643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01643

	XXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 14 Aug 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition that precluded him from obtaining an overall satisfactory rating on the contested FA. 

At the time of the FA the applicant had a 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, that exempted him from the cardio component.  However, he also had a condition with his stomach that prevented him from completing the sit-up component.  After the contested FA, he received another AF FM 422, with the additional exemptions.  

The medical condition has been validated through; an AF FM 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and a FA Test Failure memorandum signed by his medical provider.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Master Sergeant (E-7).

On 6 Aug 12, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422 Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, from 8 Aug 12 to 30 Sep 12, exempting the applicant from 1.5 mile run and the 1.0 mile walk components of the test. The applicant was cleared for the sit-up, push-up and AC components of the test. 

IAW AFI 36-2905, Para 2.10.4 “Members with a duty limiting condition (DLC) prohibiting them from performing one or more components of the FA will have a composite score calculated on the assessed components.”

On 14 Aug 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and was tested on the sit-up, push-up and AC components of the test.  He attained an overall “unsatisfactory” rating with a composite score of 61.5.  

On 7 November 2012, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, from 7 Nov 12 to 28 Nov 12, exempting the applicant from the 1.5 mile run, the 1.0 mile walk, and the sit-up components of the test. The applicant was cleared for the push-up and abdominal circumference (AC) components of the test.

On 20 Feb 13, a FA Test Failure memorandum was sent from the applicants first sergeant to his medical provider in order to determine whether a medical condition was the cause for the FA failure. The medical provider signed the memorandum and indicated a medical condition precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. 

IAW AFI 36-2905; Attach 1, para 10, “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results; and para 2.12.36, “If a member is unable to complete any required portion of the AF Fitness Program (e.g., FA, FIP session, intervention classes), the member must receive written waiver/approval from the Unit CC.”

On 24 Nov 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” 
______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to correct FA dated 14 Aug 12, stating the applicant was tested within his profile.   

DPSIM references that the applicant received certification from the medical authority that a pre-existing condition precluded him from achieving a passing score; however, did not provide a commander invalidation memo in accordance with AFI 36-2905, AFGM 4. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C)
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  While the applicant has provided medical documentation confirming the 14 Aug 12 diagnosis of his condition, he has not met his burden of proving how this condition precluded him from successfully completing the contested FA.  In this respect, we note the letter from the applicant’s medical provider indicates he had a medical condition; however no letter from the commander was provided requesting the FA be invalidated. We also considered the AF Forms 422; however, based on the 422 issued on 6 Aug 12 the applicant tested on all appropriate components of the FA and the 422 issued after the contested FA on 7 Nov 12 indicates an exemption from the sit-up component, but even with this exemption the applicant still would not have passed the FA.  Moreover, the applicant’s submission does not contain the Fitness Screening Questionnaire he was required to complete prior to participating in the assessment. Should the applicant provide such evidence to the contrary, we would be willing to reconsider his request.  However, in view of the above and in the absence of sufficient relevant evidence, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the FA dated 14 Aug 12, did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01643 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXX, Chair
	Ms. XXXXXX, Vice Chair
	Ms. XXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Mar 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14.
	




                                   XXXXXXXX
                                   Chair






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01644

    Original file (BC 2013 01644 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., “exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier.” On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591

    Original file (BC 2013 01591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, “There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment.” On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01664

    Original file (BC 2013 01664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., “exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier.” On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833

    Original file (BC 2013 05833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02768

    Original file (BC 2012 02768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This logic also concludes a medical condition causing weight gain would cause an increase in AC. She should have never taken the walk test while her dosage was still being adjusted and the FA should be invalidated based on the solid medical evidence presented. While we note the applicant requests the entire FA dated 25 Apr 2012, be removed, the AF Form 422 reflected that she was cleared to test using AC and she has not provided substantial evidence to persuade us otherwise.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03538

    Original file (BC 2013 03538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 Feb 13, he was given a AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Qualification Status, which incorrectly authorized him to complete push-ups and sit-ups during FA testing, resulting in failure of his 28 Feb 13 FA because he only completed 10 push-ups. The applicant did not provide the Army version of the profile that was given to him, nor did he provide the original profile that should have been dated and signed by the Medical Provider on or about 15 Feb 13. While the Board notes the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02960

    Original file (BC 2013 02960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An AF Form 422 dated 5 Oct 11 with the following statement: “Cleared for the following AF Fitness assessment components: Ht, Wt, AC, 1.0 mile walk.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no documentation provided by the applicant’s commander to invalidate the contested FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364

    Original file (BC-2012-02364.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01787

    Original file (BC 2013 01787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical documents mentioned above validates the applicant had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. DPSIM indicates he has not provided documentation from his medical provider stating his medical condition would prevent him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. In this respect, the applicant failed to provide a letter from his medical provider stating how his medical condition prevented him from passing the AC component...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03261

    Original file (BC-2012-03261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM states per AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, paragraph 4.2.5, all members will complete abdominal circumference (AC) assessment unless there is a composite exemption or, under rare circumstances, a component exemption determined by the exercise physiologist or fitness program manager upon recommendation by the provider. For someone who had back to back shoulder surgeries and is unable to perform physical activities for over a year, 42 days is not realistic. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant,...